Overview
The last 20 years have been a period of competitive and regulatory
turmoil in telecommunications throughout the world. Nothing from
local wireline voice telephony to international satellite data communications
has been untouched. In the United States, divestiture and deregulation
moved the telecommunications industry toward less concentrated market
structures and more reliance on competition to determine prices and
allocate resources. Many foreign governments privatized telecommunications
and removed entry barriers that protected telecommunications monopolies.
New technology and deregulation led to entry by new companies offering
international telecommunications services and changed the way the
traditional PTT/INTELSAT monopolies conduct their businesses.
Since the breakup of the Bell System, competition has increased
for a variety of telephone services in the United States. Long-distance
service has become less concentrated, and the regional Bell operating
companies have begun to face some competition from competitive access
providers, cable television companies, and interexchange carriers.
Cellular telephony has become a major business, and entry by new
mobile services using digital technologies has begun. These developments
are being accelerated by the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which
opened both local telephony and cable television distribution to
competition, deregulated certain cable rates, and created new universal
service goals and obligations. Further, the act specifies conditions
under which the former Bell monopolies could enter equipment manufacturing
and offer long distance service. These dramatic changes raise a host
of policy questions that federal and state regulators must address.

Experience
EI economists have analyzed telecommunications issues while serving
in the Federal Communications Commission, Department of Justice,
Federal Trade Commission, and White House Office of Telecommunications
Policy.
EI economists have served U.S. firms in industries such as local
wireline telephone, cellular telephone, domestic and international
long distance, satellite communications, cable television, directory
publishing, and information services. EI economists have also consulted
on telecommunications matters for international organizations, governments,
and companies in Canada, Great Britain, Argentina, Mexico, Peru,
Australia, and New Zealand.
EI experience includes the following:
 |
 |
Testimony on market
definition and market power regarding the break-up of the Bell
system |
 |
 |
Affidavits filed in
Federal Communications Commission proceedings on alleged market
power, standards, and interconnection, unbundling, and resale obligations
for cellular and other commercial mobile radio services |
 |
 |
Analysis relating
to market definition and market power in a variety of telecommunications
services, including domestic and international services provided
by communications satellites, video programming and inside wiring
services provided by telephone companies, and roaming services
provided by cellular telephone companies. |
 |
 |
Analysis and testimony
before state commissions on access to local telephone networks
and to telephone subscriber information, and on competition in
intrastate long distance telephony and private pay phone services
|
 |
 |
Study of the competitive
consequences of entry by the regional Bell operating companies
into electronic information services |
 |
 |
Analysis of the competitive
effects of mergers and joint ventures involving the provision of
global telecommunications network services, telecommunications
equipment, communications satellites and international cable transmission
services |
 |
 |
Damage studies in
private Lanham Act deceptive advertising cases, Sherman Act monopolization
suits, and contract disputes relating to local wireline, cellular,
long-distance, video conferencing, and satellite communications,
as well as telecommunications equipment |
 |
 |
Telephone rate cases
and other regulatory proceedings relating to price caps, rate design,
access charges, costs of service, advertising, and affiliated-company
transactions |
 |
 |
Testimony assessing the cost justification
for rates charged for telephone subscriber listings in overcharge complaints filed with the
Federal Communications Commission |

|
|